Why We Must Stop Relying on Student Ratings of Teaching
-Chronicle of Higher Education The internet has not only made course evaluations more unreliable, but the tone of comments now can resemble internet message boards.
-Chronicle of Higher Education The internet has not only made course evaluations more unreliable, but the tone of comments now can resemble internet message boards.
–Chronicle of Higher Education How much more informative would course evaluations be if they were delayed?
–Faculty Focus Collaborative learning tasks may unfairly disadvantage students with below-the-surface challenges, such as anxiety, autism, or other issues that interfere with effective social interactions.
–Faculty Focus As faculty, our goal is to create an environment in which students are engaged with the material, while at the same time ensuring that they are prepared to […]
– Inside Higher Ed New study of undergraduate STEM courses finds that lectures remain dominant — despite finding after finding questioning their effectiveness. See the research paper published in the March […]
– Inside Higher Ed Strategies for making learning more accessible for students with disabilities often make the classroom experience better for all students, writes Sara Schley.
– Science Advances “Sexual minority” students were 7% less likely to persist towards a STEM degree compared to their heterosexual peers.
–Inside Higher Ed A new study in PS: Political Science combines elements of prior research on gender bias in student evaluations of teaching, or SETs, and arrives at a serious conclusion: institutions […]
–Chronicle of Higher Education Columnist Anne Curzan argues for faculty members’ engaging in more discussion and mentoring about graduate pedagogy.
To gauge what it means to be a learner-centered instructor, consider these questions. (READ MORE) Characteristics of learner-centered teaching Does the course contain activities that put students in positions to learn […]